Smartial Wayback Machine Text Extractor



Live version of this page exists.
However, it is different from the archived page (2 redirect/s found...)


This article contains 1080 words.

Browsers and Platforms | Web Directions

Contents: Report Introduction Browsers HTML5 Native Apps Platform Choice The Wrap

One of the first questions we ask respondents is what browsers they use as part of their regular web use. To date, we’ve not given respondents the opportunity to nominate a mobile browser as their primary browser, which may have to change soon, but we do give them the chance to tell us “What other browsers do you regularly use for regular web use”.

Here are the results from 2008 through to 2011

What other browsers do you regularly use for regular web use (for example a mobile browser)?

2011

BrowserCountPercentageMobile Safari31823%Android16111.79%Opera Mini312.27%Opera Mobile251.83%Blackberry2.15%Palm4.3%Windows Phone 72.15%

2010

BrowserCount%Mobile Safari41329%Android523.8%Pre3.2%Blackberry151.1%Opera mini362.6%Opera mobile201.43%Nokia11.8%

2008

BrowserCount%Mobile Safari20016%Blackberry9.75%Opera mini423.4%Opera mobile201.6%Nokia201.6%

(these numbers don’t add up to 100% as this is the percentage of all respondents who use these various platforms/​browsers)

There’s no surprise that since 2008, Mobile Safari has dominated developer’s mobile browser use. But in 2010, Android jumped significantly, and at the expense of iOS, despite the launch of the iPad in early 2010 (mobile Safari is counted as a single browser across all iOS devices). Other browsers/​platforms saw no statistically significant change.

Noteworthy in the light of the 2010 launch of Windows Phone 7 is how little uptake this device had among our respondents (around 45% of whom use desktop windows). This may be due to the relatively unexciting version of IE on Windows Phone 7 to date (this looks set to change later in 2011, with a very promising version of IE9 to land on the platform later this year or early 2012). It also should be noted that Windows Phone 7 launched around 4 months before our survey, giving the platform little time to gain real traction with this audience.

Also, despite the launch (also late 2010) of the Blackberry 6 platform, featuring a vastly improved browser, the sense that Blackberry is a business, rather than developers phone is underlined with similarly little traction. Perhaps the Playbook tablet can provide a way into this market for RIM, important not so much for its own scale, but for the impact it has as an early adopter market, and in gaining potential developers for the platform — there seems a clear correlation between the devices developers use and those they develop for.

Browsers respondents test with

Beyond the browsers developers use regularly themselves, we also asked respondents what browsers they test their sites with. Here, several browsers were included as possible choices (respondents could also nominate other browsers they test with). The results as relevant to the mobile and device world are

AnswerCountPercentageSafari iPhone75355.12%Safari iPad50737.12%Opera Mobile1037.54%Opera Mini755.49%Android (Phone)29321.45%Android (Tablet)372.71%Blackberry815.93%Windows Phone 7392.86%

Developers are clearly showing signs of testing their sites in a far wider range of browsers than they regularly use, though whether it’s on devices or via emulators running on desktops is something we’ll have to include as a question in subsequent surveys.

How does this compare with previous surveys? In both late 2008 and early 2010, only Mobile Safari (21% in 2008, and 38% in 2010) and Opera Mobile (5% and 5.7%) featured among respondents answers. It’s clear from these changes, that mobile is moving toward the front and center of respondents focus when it comes to testing for web site compatibility.

Browsers respondents optimize web sites for

The next step beyond testing in a browser is optimizing for that browser (we left what this meant deliberately vague). Here too the responses are instructive.

First we ask respondents whether they “optimize their sites for devices other than laptops/​PCs”. Here’s how responses have changed over the last 3 or so years

2011

AnswerCountPercentageYes68049.78%No56341.22%

2010

AnswerCount%No80357.28%Yes45832.67%

2008

AnswerCount%Yes31025.12%No81365.88%

In 2008, only a quarter of respondents answered yes. In 2011, a plurality, and almost half responded yes. This is not folks testing to ensure pages work in a particular device, but optimizing for that device, a very significant change in the last couple of years.

We then asked respondents which devices they particularly focussed on.

2011

AnswerCountPercentageiPhone66248.46%iPad49035.87%Android Phones36426.65%Android Tablets836.08%Blackberry (5 and older)644.69%Blackberry 6805.86%Google TV120.88%webOS513.73%Windows Phone 7493.59%

2010

DeviceCount%iphone/​​mobile safari23451%blackberry235%android4710%opera mobile61.3%Palm Pre41.3%wii3.7%

2008

DeviceCount%iphone/​​mobile safari13644%blackberry134%android31%opera mobile51.6%wii51.6%

Here changes really are remarkable. While iOS continues to dominate, Android has gone from effectively no interest, to over a quarter of developers optimizing for Android phones (Android still has some work to do when it comes to Tablets, but the first Android Tablets had only been on the market a short time when this survey was done.) The total number of respondents focussing on each platform is telling. 50% more respondents optimizing their sites for Android Phones this year than iOS devices last year (while the number optimizing for iOS has more than tripled). In addition, Blackberry, webOS, and Windows Phone 7 all have non trivial attention from developers.

Opera, both Mobile and Mini, while having as many as 100 million active users, do not seem to be gaining a tremendous amount of developer interest. Perhaps developers assume their sites will “just work” on these platforms.

Almost completely missing in action is ChromeOS, eclipsed by even Google TV. Shipping behind so many new platforms and devices, it’s hard to imagine that what seemed such a promising platform can ever gain much traction among what should be it’s primary developer audience. One has to similarly wonder about the chances of Meego, certainly with this audience, despite the fact web technologies are one of the primary ways of developing for the platform.

As mentioned at the outset, something is definitely afoot at the intersection of the web and mobile platforms. Among early adopters, Android is clearly gaining traction, while a number of platforms continue to keep a foothold, and of course iOS continues to dominate. But all’s not plain sailing for Apple’s mobile platform among bell weather users. The next 12 months will be interesting.

Next we’ll look at how developers are using technologies like HTML5 and JavaScript

Contents: Report Introduction Browsers HTML5 Native Apps Platform Choice The Wrap




Please close this window manually.